Even though “Rome wasn’t built in a day” a lot can change
in 100 years. Roman architecture stood the test of time, but other things were
not as enduring. For this analysis, we will be analyzing the changes in Roman
morals during the time of Polybius and Vergil compared to those morals in the
time of Juvenal. More specifically, we will analyze the moral changes in loyalty,
funerals, and politics between these two times.
Lacking Loyalty
The first major transition in Roman morals is the altered dedication
individuals have toward the gods. Vergil exemplifies the loyalty and absolute
obedience individuals showed toward the gods in the Aeneid. When telling the story of Aeneas and Dido, Vergil depicts
the sacrifice Aeneas makes for the gods. Vergil describes, “although great love
has shaken his soul, he obeys the gods’ will and returns to the fleet,” (Lombardo). Despite the overwhelming love that
Aeneas and Dido share, Aeneas sacrifices this love because the gods had
something else in store for him. This dedication to the gods drastically
changes from Vergil’s time to Juvenal’s time.
Juvenal explained what dedication to the gods looked like. He
depicts this concept by describing the religious dedications of a “poor man”.
He says, “Though he swear by all the altars of Samothrace or of Rome, the poor
man is believed to care naught for Gods and thunderbolts, the Gods themselves
forgiving him” (Juvenal). Individuals transitioned from absolute loyalty toward
the gods to superficial dedication that didn’t honor them. According to
Juvenal, if the gods were to ask the “poor man” to sacrifice as Aeneas did,
they would be ignored.
Lacking
Respect
The second major transition we will discuss is the lack of respect
later Romans have for the dead. During the time of Polybius, “Whenever one of
their illustrious men dies, in the course of his funeral the body is carried
with every kind of honour into the Forum” (Finley). The funeral was an
incredibly high honor and relations would sacrifice much to have their relative
properly and respectfully buried. This procession was a highly important part
of every Roman family and was found throughout Roman culture. As with the trend
of our discussion, this respect was lost over time.
Juvenal describes that loss emphasizing, “The poor man’s crushed
corpse wholly disappears, just like his soul. At home meanwhile the folk,
unwitting, are washing the dishes…” (Juvenal). On one side you have crushed lifeless
bodies. On the other side, people continue with their lives as if nothing had happened.
The value of proper burial is clearly lost in Roman culture during Juvenal’s
time. This lack of respect for the dead marks a historical turn in Roman culture.
Lacking Honesty
The last major transition that we will discuss relates to the
honesty and integrity of elected Roman officials. During Polybius’s time, it
was expected that individuals be honest and trustworthy. In the Portable Greek Historians, Polybius
mentions that “nothing is more disgraceful than to receive bribes and to make
profit by improper means. The Carthaginians obtain office by open bribery, but
among the Romans the penalty for it is death,” (Finley). Polybius emphasizes
that Romans were honest whether by their own means or by force. The passage
above illustrates this concept. In Rome, individuals were expected to be “model
citizens”. Juvenal sheds a very different light on the subsequent morals of Roman
society.
In his analysis, Juvenal characterizes politicians as corrupt thieves.
In his Satire 3, he says, “No man
will get my help in robbery, and therefore no governor will take me on his
staff” (Juvenal). According to Juvenal, bribes and lies were a part of the political
game. He personally viewed these dealings as corrupt. During this time, one could
not be successful without wealth and influence. Wealth was attained through
dishonest dealings and power was attained through copious bribes.
Changing Morals
In conclusion, it is clear to see how drastically the morals of
Roman society changed within a century. The enduring records and stories created
by Polybius, Vergil, and Juvenal paint a detailed picture on what it was like
living during these periods. The drastic change in Roman morals could be due to the changing wants of Roman citizens. The altering morals are a testament to how
easily people and cultures evolve. This relationship between the two contrasting
times parallels with the pendulum concept representing human nature. We will swing
one direction to a time of honesty and goodness just to swing back to a time of
corruption and turmoil.
Works Cited
- Vergil, and Lombardo, S. (2006). The Essential Aeneid. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub. Co., pp. 64.
- Finley, M. I. The Greek Historians: The Essence of Herodotus, Thucydides, Xenophon, Polybius. Penguin Books, pp. 496-499.
- Juvenal, Ramsay, G. G. Juvenal: Satire 3. Harvard University Press, pp. 126, 249, 41. Available at: https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/ancient/juv-sat3eng.asp [Accessed 4 June 2018].
Jenn narrowing down the moral decay into three focus areas really helped simplify how great the effect of Economic wealth and Military power had on the Roman society. It's interesting how those two factor led to a change in loyalty, respect for fellow citizens, and corruption in government. I also really liked your analogy of a pendulum and how human society tends to swing back and forth in accordance with how blessed their nation is.
ReplyDeleteFirst off, I think you did an excellent job at organizing your ideas by including bold headers. I found your paragraph on respect to be most interesting with your comments on how they respected the bodies of the dead. We focused a ton on respect for the dead in the first part of the class, and I thought it was fantastic that you found a way to tie that lack of respect of the later Roman society. Nice blog post!
ReplyDelete